Someoned lied about lying about them lying cuz the lied about lying when they last lied about lying because the lies while lying when they lied about lying the nigh befor because they lied for lying even though they lied on perpose about lying so they lied abot lying...
Since the rules define an answer, there can't be an answer (since there are no rules). Therefore we deduce that the answer is 'nothing'. However, this creates two paradoxes. First of all, there is no answer but we then end up with an answer. Second of all, we are saying that putting nothing in gains money.