Agnosticism presents itself as the neutral position between two extremes, Theism and Atheism, and it seems to be quite intellectual and even wise; it claims that, because of the limits of human knowledge we cannot know whether God exists.
But does Agnosticism legitimately hold the middle ground as some propose it does? Or is it merely an avoidance of the pursuit of knowledge?

Agnosticism claims that God is unknowable, but I present this case. If reason can allow us to uncover truths about the natural world, why would it err in the most fundamental question of them all- the existence of God and the transcendent?
If we can use reason to come to valued conclusions on such things as morality and math it would be logical to come to the conclusion that we can use reason to find God, for morality and even math have a sense of transcendence to them; they cannot be touched or observed in the physical yet they have the most profound impacts on our lives, and the same would be said of God, for faith is the assurance of what we do not see.

I will go even further to say that God's existence is not just a matter of faith, but a logical necessity.
The universe operates under certain intelligible laws, such as described by mathematics and physics, laws like gravity, quantum physics, and thermodynamics. These laws are not random, but structured in a way we can study, observe, predict, and rely on them when we make technological and scientific movements.
Why should the universe and reality conform to logical and mathematical structures that allow us to make sense of it? The fact that mathematical principles describe reality so perfectly, while not even being in a physical reality alludes to a transcendent, perfect, and all-knowing being who created this perfect system. This being must be transcendent because mathematical principles in and of themselves do not exist in our physical reality, this being must be perfect because, logically, an imperfect being cannot create a perfect thing, this being must be all-knowing as to create a perfect system that supersedes any possible mind of a normal nature.

The very principles of logic, the law of non-contradiction, the principle of causality, and the impossibility of an infinite regress all point to a necessary, self-existent being that grounds reality itself.
To claim that God’s existence is unknowable is to overlook the very tools we use to uncover truth. The same rational faculties that allow us to recognize mathematical truths and scientific laws also allow us to deduce the necessity of a First Cause. If everything that begins to exist requires an explanation, and if the universe itself is contingent, then reason compels us to acknowledge something beyond the material world, something eternal and self-sufficient.

Agnosticism is not, then, a neutral position but a mere refusal to follow logic to its natural conclusion. If the evidence of God is embedded in the very stricture of creation itself, the question is not whether we can know if God exists, but whether we are willing to follow where reason leads us.