Hello SDK, welcome to my blog.

A reoccurring theme is the debate of the /rules. When most people get banned, this instantly try to defend themselves, and attempt to persuade others of they're innocence. You screwed up, move on. And if you can talk about it, your ban is either over, or your using an alt to avoid a ban, which is also bannable. That's not what this is about though, it's about those who seek innocence by questioning the authority of the admin by quoting /rules, and stating that what they did is not in there. This is a common misconception that the only things that are bannable are in /rules. Hull doesn't have time to put down every single little thing that is bannable, /rules are actually guidelines, not a set of rules. Admins are the real rules, they have the authority to deem something bannable or not. If you truly feel that something was not worth a ban, and that he/she abused they're power, then take it to a different, admin one you trust. If he/she feels it wasn't worth a ban either, and it is worth taking to an overlord for question of deadminship, do so.

Thank you again for all your patience,
Kingdom Hearts III