Ahem, hello all. I'm going to start up a blog war. =) Now you might be thinking, "Blah blah there is no argument here! Blah blah blah! Evolution ftw!"

Haha, that makes me laugh. The sad part is you couldn't possibly be more wrong.

Charles Darwin is considered the creator of evolution. He was a very strong racist, just like to point that out.
Well... I don't know where to start, so I'll just begin with the tons of facts that are against the evolution theory.
We have Microevolution and Macroevolution. Microevolution is the theory that natural selection can, over time, take an organism and transform it into a more specialized species of that organism.
Macroevolution is the hypothesis that processes similar to those at work in microevolution can, over eons of time, transform an organism into a completely different kind of organism.

Evolution is all based on macroevolution, Charles Darwin actually attempted many tests to change cows into horses. A clear fail. Time to get scientific.

You see, microevolution is simple to plain. When God created the animals and plants, he built into their genetic code a great amount of variability. As these plants and animals began reproducing, this variability began manifesting itself. This built-in variation was then acted upon by natural selection to create the variation that we see within a particular kind of creature. Thus, God probably created a "typical" dog during the creation week, and then the process of microevolution produced the many variations of dog that we see today. Microevolution, then, is a testament to God's foresight. As the Creator, God knew that the creatures of His world would have to adapt in order to survive. Thus, He built in their genetic codes the ability to change, and microevolution is simply the theory that describes how that change takes place and is directed by the pressures of the environment.

Macroevolution, however, is something quite different. Will finish in new blog