The media have made it sound like Pope Francis has a groundbreaking viewpoint on homosexuality of clergy in the Catholic Church for stating "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” The media call him more "progressive" than predecessors for this and think this is just one of many "changes" he wants to make to the Catholic Church.
To counter the media reaction, I posit that what he said is nothing shocking or new. I am going to break down what he said and why his quote is not groundbreaking. Remember that Pope Francis is a Jesuit priest, who are some of the most well-educated Christians in the study of Scripture, across all denominations of the Church. Thus, I am going to base this dissection of his words fully on Scripture.
I will start with a quick discussion on judgment of others, from the last part of that quotation.
At the time of Jesus, the political leaders of Judaism were the Pharisees. He pointed out their hypocrisy on numerous occasions in that they didn't practice what they preached. They would condemn people as sinners, yet do the same things themselves. To the idea of hypocritical judgment, Jesus said in Matthew 7 (NIV):
1 Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
Next, we will move to where the Pope speaks of "searching for the Lord".
Jesus follows in the same chapter of Matthew with the common theme throughout his teachings of the humble search for faith:
7 “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.
What he is saying in this passage is that all humans are sinners and that no one will be turned away, if they are seeking God.
Finally, we will move to the core of the so-called controversial statement by the Pope: homosexual priesthood.
Now, specifically with Catholic priests, the Church has chosen that they all take a vow of celibacy, so sexuality isn't even part of life, as long as the individual has the strength to suppress the urges and live a holy path.
Here are Jesus' words on the matter from Matthew 19:12 (NIV), which comes right after the discussion of divorce and adultery:
"For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."
Never once does the Bible (Old or New Testament) state that being a homosexual is wrong. It does, however, say that homosexual actions are sinful - as are many heterosexual actions, like adultery and fornication. Since a priest takes a vow of celibacy, none of those sins come into the picture. Only the internal struggles of lust and coveting are what matter.
Since priests are only human, they fall to these sins-of-the-mind, like any one else. Still it is commendable how the vast majority of them can go an entire lifetime without falling into the trap of physically sinning.
Now, lets take this discussion a step further and speak of a hypothetical scenario where the Catholic Church decides that clergy can begin to marry.
St. Peter is considered to be the first Pope by Catholic tradition, and he was married, as shown in another passage from Matthew, this time 8:14 (NIV):
When Jesus came into Peter's home, He saw his mother-in-law lying sick in bed with a fever.
One cannot have a mother-in-law without a wife! Historical documents actually show that Peter may have had a daughter later in life, as well.
If the Catholic Church opens marriage to clergy, then it would only be traditional heterosexual marriage, since that is the only form of marriage allowed in Scripture. Thus, priests who are non-acting homosexuals would remain celibate.
My faith in humanity is lost. What really sucks about issues like this is that the definition of marriage can change or fluctuate to whatever you want. Outside of scripture at least.
Biblical interpretations of verses speaking of boundaries in marriage need to be carefully examined. Some people like to take verses out of context and claim that -specifically- homosexuality is "ok" here, but "over there" is another meaning. A contradiction... If scripture did so easily contradict itself it would have been overthrown a very long time ago.
If I don't like what the Bible says about homosexuality, I guess I should interpret the verses as I please. Or, better, ignore the scripture entirely and find some other answer no matter how wild. It just needs to appeal to me.
If only there were not such things as right and wrong..
Just gonna throw this out there:
The only true criteria for what is acceptable for a partner should be:
Sentience, because it's hard to love something that can't move that way.
Human or greater intelligence, because why do you want beastiality?
Sexual maturity because pedophilia is just icky.
An ability to communicate verbally (body language is a dangerous road to travel without verbal confirmation), because communication is important to keep a healthy relationship, and because communication means they have the ability to say yes or no, and that's important to have so you don't get charged with rape. :3
The rest is just personal preference, male, female, human or otherwise... ^-^ As long as it passes the Harkness Test, why should there be anything wrong with it?
*Holds up a picture of a human and an alien in a wedding ceremony*
Leviticus 18:22 is one of the many verses says that homosexuality is an abomination.
@HullBreach
02 Aug 2013 23:55
In reply to NillocSkywalker
As stated in the blog, all biblical references speak of sexual acts (I.e. Sodomy, fornication, and adultery) - with the exeption of the internal struggles of lust and coveting (both of which apply to everyone).
@Kin no Kokoro
05 Aug 2013 19:40
In reply to NillocSkywalker
Yeah well I hate your comment.
I mean, seriously? Going up to a religion blog only to say that you hate religion blogs? Are you only like this on the internet or do you go to fish restaurants to announce loudly and obnoxiously that you hate seafood?
Seriously? You're gonna troll THAT? Why not troll the fact that people are saying homosexuality is ok but homosexual acts are not okay? See this is why I hate religion blogs. And I stated that AFTER arguing with a bunch of bisexuals here.
@Kin no Kokoro
06 Aug 2013 10:02
In reply to NillocSkywalker
Who said homosexuality is okay when homosexual acts arent? This blog just explained how the pope actually just said that homosexuality is irrelevant to wether or not someone can be a priest.
The Bible CLEARLY says that homosexualitt is WRONG. Adulterous acts can be done BOTH by straight and gays. And for gays it will always be adultery because they can never be married in the sight of God. But gays can repent of their sins (including homosexuality) and go to heaven.
I'm not gonna hate someone because their gay (being a brony has helped me with that). Hate the sin, not the sinner.
@LinkZelda
02 Aug 2013 19:59
In reply to NillocSkywalker
Gay marriage isn't true because procreation inside one is impossible. The purpose of marriage is to procreate. Therefore homosexual actions are always done outside of 'marriage' (i.e. a marriage for procreation).
However if you think outside the box, gay Christians are still fulfilling the purpose of marriage by adopting and raising children to be Christians. Therefore homosexual acts could be seen as a way to strengthen this marriage just like sex for a heterosexual one. In fact, some churches allow contraception for married couples. This proves that sex in marriage can just be to strengthen love.
Therefore a gay marriage is a 'way' to serve God. But probably not the 'intended' way.
Just a quick note on the procreation argument, I think it's utter crap that nobody considers the fact that infertile couples have "valid" marriages as long as they are heterosexual. And that alone should render it an invalid argument because of hypocrisy.
One more thing for the people reading.
The violation of sanctity argument was used against interracial marriage because like gay marriage, it was seen as "unholy" and "unnatural". :3 Just gonna say that and leave you guys to think about it.
A man and a woman unified with their own children is the marriage God wants.
An infertile couple should be allowed to marry but it would never be the ideal marriage. However God with his omnibenevolence should allow them to have and maintain this relationship if they look for ways to raise a family (surrogacy, adoption, etc.)
The same applies to gay couples too.
Sex is a part of all marriages and so should be allowed in both.
@BanMan
02 Aug 2013 00:50
In reply to NillocSkywalker
I agree with much of that.
If someone does something wrong, that doesn't mean you have to be judging them.
@ZerstorenHV
01 Aug 2013 20:58
In reply to NillocSkywalker
Show me the carfax.
@Danyelle
01 Aug 2013 18:49
In reply to NillocSkywalker
It doesn't say it's wrong. Pretty sure it says they should be stoned or something, but it's like a way of how it says you should pay for your sins, which, like it's said in the blog, homosexuality is said to be sinful in the bible... Sorta like if you steal, the bible says you should get your get your hand cut off.
The Bible CLEARLY says it's wrong. Why else should you be stoned for your sins? Sinning is wrong.
@Danyelle
02 Aug 2013 16:54
In reply to NillocSkywalker
Anything can be "wrong". Depends on who's looking at it. Someone may be homosexual, but they might now be the one stealing or killing. Both can be considered wrong, even though killing/stealing is an obvious one. But what makes homosexuality so wrong?
@Astra Moon
04 Aug 2013 12:50
In reply to Danyelle
Many things are deemed as "wrong" in the eyes of the bible/God. But as times have moved on & people have taken a step UP in society, these things have been rethought, reworded, & above all, upgraded.
@Astra Moon
04 Aug 2013 12:51
In reply to Astra Moon
If you think of it, we don't 'stone' people anymore due to there sins & that's just 1 example. WHY? Because as time has moved on, people's thoughts & actions have also.
Thanks for making this. People kept saying that in Christianity, all gay people must die or whatever, but I don't believe that. It was a question I was going to ask in the Misconceptions blog, but I forgot.
@LaZerWoLF
02 Aug 2013 17:59
In reply to FancyPants
The Misconceptions stuff was an unofficial blog series.