@ The Ram - 1984 is about a society ruled by oligarchical dictatorship. The public is being mind controled by the government. (If I remember correctly). I read it a few years ago. It's a great read.
Back to the main topic, I think that wearing your pants hanging off of your butt is disgusting and degenerate. However, precious time and money shouldn't be spent on such a useless law. And that's all I have to say about that.
This is just like every law ever considered in [b[California[/b]. This is a situation that can be easily dealth with by the parents. But do the parents want to actually parent their children? Of course not.
Save sex-give birth-raise to certain age-start blaming governent for kids' issues-rabble.
Whoa bro, better slow down bro, don't wanna be a bro, bro.
@XxEmoNinjaxX You stole that summary word for word from Wikipedia...way to go. :P
@theram Well, California is already deep in the bankruptcy well, so they said "Why not?!" and decided to continue digging. ;D
I suppose most that do it ^^^ that badly do so because it makes them a "thug". If they new what the actual definition of the word was, they wouldn't want to be known as one.
Thug, a common criminal, who treats others violently and roughly, often for hire.
And if you think about it, since this may end up being fined, it's really for economic reasons: revenue generation.
It's my job to help the next generation, and set a good example for them. And for that I'll gladly lay down my life.
Hmm... True. But it's only going to boost revenue by .000001%, if even. Frthermore, it's like J-Walking, which is 'illegal and fine-worthy' in Chicago, but no officer is going to waste time writing a ticket when someone's smuggling drugs 5 blocks down. :P
P.s; When did my name become Theram? :U
Whoa bro, better slow down bro, don't wanna be a bro, bro.
Not all baggy pants fall below your waste, as you can have baggy pants in which they're still fitting aroundvyour waste therefor they ain't falling off. So I still don't see the point in comparing "baggy pants" with "non-fitting pants".
Thejew- It's really just a way of a style amongst a certain group of people. I noticed it more with the "gang" relations to diffrentiate them out from other people.
But people notice that they're doing it so then they start wearing their pants below their waste and more an people do the same an it spreads like a disease and becomes a fashion.
Don't argue with idiots because they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Well if this `law` will effect us then most people will be getting tickets. *Cop* Hey you! Over there with the saggy pants!
*Me* Huh? Me?
*Cop* Yeah you, here`s your ticket.
*Me* Ohoho, your giving me a ticket? Then you better go give a ticket to everyone else in this school.
iciownu- If you may please re-read my post and understand the full point and meaning as of which I have said. It's noticeable that you havn't by the response you gave. I didn't state you had to be in a gang in order to wear pants that fall below your waste. this is exactly what I said "I noticed it more with the "gang" relations to diffrentiate them out from other people."
And please re-read this part too, "Not all baggy pants fall below your waste, as you can have baggy pants in which they're still fitting around your waste therefor they ain't falling off. So I still don't see the point in comparing "baggy pants" with "non-fitting pants"."
Don't argue with idiots because they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
I'm glad these laws are in place. To me, pants below your butt is stupid. Especially holding them and walking around like you've got fecal matter in your pants. Come on guys, either wear a belt or get some pants that fit.
4/5 People suffer from diarrhea. Does that mean the other enjoys it?