Bulletin Board Posts by bonesboy368

The distinguished DarkGuy101 spake:

The distinguished PasserByGuy spake:This may be a kid's site but making a mockery of the court system?

That's just freaking wrong.
This thread doesn't deserve a lock, it deserves permanent deletion.

The judiciary system is serious--it is not a game.

Seriously?
I mean, how old are you?
Ten years old?

Grow up.

If so... leave him alone... its just a suggestion, not something you "complain" about... in your case, "cry" about... what if he is 10 years... just... if you have nothing nice to type, then dont type at all...

AMEN

The distinguished Skittles spake:

My post was deleted... o.O

I like the idea of having a ban review kind of thing. Simply seeing if the Admin banned fairly.

i agree...it is just simply seeing iff the admin banned fairly.

The distinguished Bud401 spake:

I like the idea! But if you guys want TMJ, this will have to wait :p

this has nothing to do with tmj...kthxbai

The distinguished Moulder spake:

This is what I think should happen:
Now if a user is being banned for 24 hours they're banned! Nothing much to say about that, it's just a day. But if let us just say that if a user was going to be permad, maybe that could be a court matter. I'm going to link this thread to Hull's profile for him to see.

thank you soo much for linking this to his profle, and thats why i excluded the 24 hr. ban, or even the skunkbot ban, [because its only 4 hours]

The distinguished Waffle King spake:

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

amen

The distinguished Skittles spake:

And really, this should only occur in cases where there is a dispute between the Admin who banned and others present. And by others, I don't mean one other member, I mean at least a few, otherwise, when someone wants to make trouble, they can't just have one of their friends come to the chat room to vouch for them. :l

thats actually a pretty good idea...because the courtrooms should be reserved for larger matters

The distinguished LinkZelda spake:

Maybe the jury is just the first five people to accept an invite. An admin could also testify for a longer ban.

What about precedent though? Can the previous decision be used if the case is similar? Is it bound by courts higher up in the US or Europe?

i like your thinking....randomly selected people should be out....but it should be people who have no oppion [misspelled] on the matter, like in rl

ok so i know it seems nuts but let me explain. there should be two types of courtrooms, modderator and personal, then there should be two sub groups, open viewing and closed viewing. now let me explain to you about each group/sub-group. modderator courtrooms will basicly be places where a person can explain why or why not they should be banned, with exeptions of talking in the rp rooms, skunk/savent bot bans, or 24hr. bans. these should be carried out by a different personn than the baner. now lets explain a user courtroom. a user courtroom can be submitted to judge, [kind of like a gameshow host but for courts] if the judge approves, than a user can have there own personal courtroom for a small amount of time. but the user cant be the judge, now lets explain open and closed courtrooms. open and closed courtrooms are self explanatory, its kinda like people watching a case in a actual courtroom, weather the can come in or not. now lets go over jurys. they will be randomly selected people from paint, mainly people who have been on for more than a month, who are also willing to do it. thank you for reading this and i hope my idea gets used.