Bulletin Board Posts by COMMANDER

Yes

These aren't limericks.

Okay, I have a plan.
But I'm going to need some items.

I will need a gallon of diesel, 20 feet of rope, a shower curtain, a llama, lots of warm colored paint, a compass, and a few ingots of platinum.

The distinguished Raisons du Coeur spake:

The distinguished COMMANDER spake:[quote]Ted Nugent!

Nick Nugget![/quote]
Fred Flintstone!

The distinguished jsa005 spake:

The distinguished Skittles spake:[quote]Most people here seem unaware of the fact that -for some users - actually updating all the necessary database tables to replace your old username with your new one could amount to thousands or tens of thousands of alterations across multiple tables:

Chatroom posts, tWiiter, HB Online, User table, Profile, Profile comments, Blogs, Blog Comments, Forum threads, Forum posts, Paintings, Polls, Poll votes, Photos, Photo Albumns, Photo Albumn comments, Sprites, Game highscores, OverlorDS, Groups, Group Shouts, Group Requests, (eventually) TMJ, TMJ Items.


That's not a set of SQL queries HullBreach is going to want to be running often, which is why it is and should be left to him.

I do believe it's kept by user ID #, not name, so even if my name got changed to Goshdducegddeuedefd the content would still be linked to that.
On my & Wayne1556's site Eye3DS we run a simple SQL query to check the name.
Note we don't allow username changes at the moment.[/quote]

Actually it is easier than that. Me and HullBreach both store user content in the database under member ID's. So when someone gets a name change, all previous content such as blogs, forums, etc, are updated on the spot. There are no special queries, and no manual updating. Because the ID is saved, the database takes the ID of, say, an author of a blog, and retrieves the current username.

Ted Nugent!

We should ban Florida. It looks like a gun.

Then I will call it as I see it. I may be "homophobic", but I at least have a life outside Skyrim.
As I see it, you are gay, and in the closet.

Do I have a problem with it? No.

Perhaps I am a homophobe, but I will protect traditional values, even if it means getting called "homophobe" or "racist" and even small minded.

What you don't know about me is I actually have an open mind. I don't hate people, I sometimes get angry at them, but unless they give me a reason to hate, I do not hate for no reason.

You, for example. Yes, I find you stubborn, quick to judge and anger, and sometimes I want to punch you through the screen, but do I hate you? No.

You have me misunderstood, and I as well.
Nothing like a little debate to start the morning.

Calling me childish names does not answer me.

Answer me, yes or no?

You're gay, aren't you?

The distinguished Haruspex spake:

The distinguished COMMANDER spake:[quote]The distinguished EpicArtifex spake:<blockquote>I have no idea what the BSA is, but not letting gays into an organisation for no reason other than that they're gay is dumb in any circumstance.

So, you have no idea what this organization is, but you are going to comment about it just because they don't let gays enter? Sounds pretty immature of you.

So tell me, should gays be allowed in a gentleman's club? Probably not, because they don't like boobs. Should gays be allowed in anti-gay parties? No, because that would be just plain stupid.

Small organizations have the right to discriminate against any person from any service. Why do you think restaurants have that sign "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" sign?

Too much for you? Good. Now why don't you be a good kid, and do some research what the BSA is, and maybe you will find a reason they do not allow gays, instead of being a liberal tree-hugger that believes anything you hear.</blockquote>

This is the most condescending thing I have ever read in my life.

First, Artifex is from England, and they do not have the BSA over there, if you would have done a little bit of research before you spoke to him like a five year old, you would have realized that, but whatevs, he is totally immature for speaking his mind and asking a valid question. His bad.


Second, gays are allowed into Gentlemen's Club all the time, just because "OMG BOOBS GROSS" does not mean they will not have a good time hanging out with their heterosexual friends and enjoying time away from work, the office, real lives. But hey, OMG BOOBIES GAYS HAET BEWBIES LOLOL LTS NOT LET THEM IN BEKUS DEY MITE HIT ON US BLAH BLAH.

Thirdly, small organizations do have the right, but the BSA is not a small organization in the least at all, and while they are funded by Church, they apparently overcame years of segregation and separation and let a large group of kids that were shunned from participating in a very important part of a boys life.

Also, yea, when we let gays in the military, they actually fought for the country that tried to shun them into oblivion because they liked something "normal" people didn't, what did you do? wWay to go America you dun goofed there, letting those bad bad homos fight for your country that you supposedly love so much that you do the good American deed and sit in your hoverround consuming more McDonalds, while those bad bad bad homos are out there fighting for your rights that you decided to deny them.

Silly homos.
[/quote]

You know an awful lot about the gay culture.

You are yelling at me for the same reason I am yelling at him. Lack of research, which tells me you are only siding with him either because A) As I have noticed for a long time, you seem to have a strong interest in the gay culture and will defend ANYBODY who stands with their "rights".
Or B) you just simply dislike me, and will side with ANYBODY who disagrees with me.

Either way, perhaps I have mis-worded, perhaps "not allowed" is too strong, more like "It wouldn't make very much sense". I apologize for the misunderstanding.

Second, British or not, this fellow could have done research on BSA before opening HIS mouth. I do not have time, with my full-time job as a contractor, and a musician by weekends, to keep track of all the locations of every user on here. So I really don't think trying to use my words against me in this fashion was really effective. And he did not speak his mind in a very mature way. "I don't know what BSA is, but I am boycotting it now because they do not allow gays". If that had been me that said that, you would have been all over me. Unless my first theory was correct. So was he speaking his mind? I guess so. Did he word it properly and do his own research? No. Where I come from, you can get beat up for that.

Third, BSA is a traditional organization, therefore traditional values MUST be held. If not allowing gays preserves these values, then so be it. But the libtards got to them, and I must say I am disappointed in BSA.

Must I refresh your memory that straight people in the army were sexually harassed and even raped by gay men? That's the only fighting I see them do. And the same reason boys and girls have separate bathrooms, to prevent sexual harassment and rape.

And what's wrong with McDonalds? Thanks to them, I gained 50 pounds of much needed fat, now I weigh 145 pounds :D

Go ahead, try again. I love contradicting people, and I love a challenge.

The distinguished Haruspex spake:

The distinguished Quesadilla spake:[quote]Isn't BSA filled with young boys, like 8 thru 13 year olds? Why are boys claiming they're gay that age? They shouldn't ban gays from anywhere, but do you see the point I'm tryna make here?

That is the Cub Scouts, which is 7 to 10 years old, 11 to 18 is Boy Scouts, and no, I do not see the point you are "tryna" make, there is no age limit on feeling different, there is no age limit on realizing that you like something that other people think is "wrong and different"

However, there is an age limit on when you can act upon it, but that gets thrown out the window at lower ages ever year thanks to internet usage, music, movies, kids programming, and lack of parenting, but that is a whole different topic, and this is about Boy Scouts.

While I agree the Scouts should never discriminate against color, creed, sexuality, etc, it is a private foundation which means it is privately funded, and runs mostly off of donations, sales, etc, also the Scouts follow Christian values, which is why at one point homosexual boys were not allowed, and if they were, they had to be "closeted" or risk all of their hard work and dedication to be lost and gone forever, and pretty much "outcasted" from the Scouts.

Is this wrong? Yes, in a humane way its horrible, discriminating, and hateful to an extent, but since they are funded privately and by the church, they can uphold that as their rights as Americans.[/quote]

For once, I actually agree with you.

My feelings on this whole thing....
We have Boy Scouts, we have Girl Scouts. It isn't discriminatory, is it?
It is sex biased, is it not?

No...

It is because TRADITIONALLY (which a lot of people these days lack traditional values, mainly gays and liberals), boys like to hike and learn how to tie knots, and girls like to make cupcakes and cookies. Before you know it, libtards will start saying that this is sexual discrimination, and allow girls in boy scouts, and vice-versa.

Now lets think for a moment, what problem could that cause?
I suppose that could mess up the names of the camp. That's one problem.
Another problem is that it would destroy traditional values.
One more problem.... Distraction and possibly hanky-panky.

Now then, gays are like girls. They like boys. They lack boobs, but they still like boys.
You think letting girls in boy scouts is stupid?
What difference, other than gender, does it make if they were gay?
Same problems, different gender.


After all, look what happened when we let gays in the army.

The distinguished EpicArtifex spake:

I have no idea what the BSA is, but not letting gays into an organisation for no reason other than that they're gay is dumb in any circumstance.

So, you have no idea what this organization is, but you are going to comment about it just because they don't let gays enter? Sounds pretty immature of you.

So tell me, should gays be allowed in a gentleman's club? Probably not, because they don't like boobs. Should gays be allowed in anti-gay parties? No, because that would be just plain stupid.

Small organizations have the right to discriminate against any person from any service. Why do you think restaurants have that sign "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" sign?

Too much for you? Good. Now why don't you be a good kid, and do some research what the BSA is, and maybe you will find a reason they do not allow gays, instead of being a liberal tree-hugger that believes anything you hear.

The distinguished jsa005 spake:

The distinguished Mavric spake:[quote]Dear jsa,
<br>
<br>The government spends to much money on sports.

<br>I live in the UK! ^_^ No stupid American government...
<br>The ones who created SOPA/PIPA are... total dummies.
<br>It will affect the whole internet though... õ_õ
<br>[/quote]Lucky bastard >_>

RON PAUL!!!

You will need a second table for comments.
In the table, add a table for the blog ID, so that the comments can be identified for each blog.
In your query, use LEFT JOIN to join your blog table and comment table by the blog ID columns.

The distinguished Haruspex spake:

So yea, remember how you guys said it wouldnt get passed?
<br>
<br>Guess what.
<br>
<br>It got passed.
<br>
<br>Say goodbye to your freedom.

So why am I still not prosecuted yet? :D

-confused-

Why not just make your own from scratch?